View Full Version : What would a theory board be without an Asmodean Theory?
Knarfling
1st July 2001, 00:31
I know that this had been discussed to death. I also know that telling someone that their Asmodean theory is wrong is something like telling a mother that her favorite child is ugly. But, although my conclusion has been discussed a lot, there are several bits of evidence that I have not seen much of.
<BR>
<BR>My first clue is in the prologue to LoC. Demandred reports that Graendal claims that Moggy "failed to meet her as they agreed." Yet we never see them meet or even dicuss meeting. When Moggy visits Graendal in PoD, no mention of meetings or missed meetings is ever discussed.
<BR>
<BR>One question is why did Graendal even report that Moggy missed a meeting? Reporting that Moggy missed a meeting only informs the other Forsaken that they were meeting and perhaps plotting against them. The only other purpose that I can think of to report this is to warn the others that Moggy might be dead. And yet, one missed meeting should not raise an alarm. Moggy was known for hiding in the shadows. When Sammaels talks to Graendal in PoD, he is sure that Moggy is up to her old tricks of hiding.
<BR>
<BR>Could it be that Graendal knows more than what she told? Is is possible that she knows that Moggy was captured and wants to warn the others, but also wants to avoid questions about how she knows? How would she know that Moggy was captured and how does this all tie in to Asmodean's death?
<BR>
<BR>Here is the theory. Graendal is in T'A'R with Rahvin when Rand toasts him. Perhaps she arrives to late to help or perhaps she is just watching. She sees Nyn heal Rand's wounds and then listens as Nyn tells Moggy that she will see her in Salidar. Graendal then stays in Caemlyn to loot Rahvin's stash and is discovered by Asmodean. Not knowing about Asmodean's shield, and being one of the stronger female Forsaken, she kills him quickly and hides the body to keep anyone from knowing that she was there. She then reports these details to the DO.
<BR>
<BR>It is true that there is no proof that she was there or that she stayed in Caemlyn to loot, despite the fact that she looted Illian when Sammael died. However, there are several things that can be explained by this theory.
<BR>
<BR>1. How the DO knew so much about the details of Rahvin's and Asmo's deaths. Demandred was surprised at his knowledge and the details that the DO knew.
<BR>
<BR>2. Halima knew that Moggy was in Salidar with a Ter'angreal around her neck. Moggy was disguised well enough to fool all the Aes Sedai, but Halima went right up to her and knew who she was.
<BR>
<BR>3. Graendal is sure that Moggy is dead. When she steps out of the Gateway with Cyndane, Graendal is surprised because Moggy is the very last person she expected to see. She knows that Aes Sedai would kill a captured Forsaken, and if they don't, the Dark One has a way of killing his followers for letting themselves be captured.
<BR>
<BR>While there are other theories about who killed Asmo, this is the only one that has so many other clues that support it. While Lanfear had the best motive, she has a problem with being dead or captured at the time. It could only have been Graendal that killed him.
<BR>
<BR>Knarfling
Sofie
1st July 2001, 18:04
Correct me if I'm wrong, wotism vets, but isn't this about the same theory we had over at the old board? The one that a girlfriend of someone at the board came up with?
<BR>
<BR>Anyway, I think you're about right. Graendal = sure!
<BR>
<BR>Sofie
ShadowReaver
20th July 2001, 02:50
wow. . . .that was REALLY thorough. . . .you've got me convinced <IMG SRC="/forum/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif">
Richelieu
7th August 2001, 16:24
Quote 1 related to Quote 2 below:
<BR>_____________________________________
<BR>not to rain on your parade....
<BR>Posted by: Ciro
<BR>Date: Saturday, May 27, 2000 - 6:22 pm
<BR>
<BR>let me say this nicely before somebody else chews you up.
<BR>
<BR>this HAS been discussed. I myself stated this in a thread LONG before Edīs Girflfriend came up with her theory... and that was about 9 months ago..
<BR>
<BR>sorry. <IMG SRC="/forum/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif">
<BR>______________________________________________
<BR>
<BR>Quote 2:
<BR>
<BR>Asmodean's Killer (New Proof)
<BR> Knarfling<Knarfling@aol.com> (Saturday, May 27, 2000 - 4:41 pm)
<BR>
<BR> I know, I know, this has been beat to death. But recently I was re-reading Fires of Heaven and I had to ask a question. When I figured out the answer, Asmo's killer leaped out of the book and
<BR> bit me. This theory will answer 8 requirements needed to be the killer.
<BR> 1. Means
<BR> 2. Motive
<BR> 3. Opportunity
<BR> 4. Recognized by Asmodean (and scared him)
<BR> 5. Disposed of the body
<BR> 6. Knows Asmodean's fate
<BR> 7. The reason the death is kept secret.
<BR> 8. Be "obvious" (as per Robert Jordan)
<BR>
<BR> I will not spend a lot of time on people that it can't be, but concentrate on just a few suspects.
<BR>
<BR> The item that caught my attention was, Nyneave having to heal Rand after balefiring Rahvin. Why did she have to heal him if everything that Rhavin did was undone when he balefired him?
<BR> We know that things prior to Rand being hurt were undone (Asmo's, Mat's and Avi's death), so why weren't Rand's wounds undone?
<BR>
<BR> I then realized I was making an assumption. I assumed that Rahvin caused the wounds. But what if another Forsaken was with Rahvin in dreamland? Someone who wanted to slip in a bit of
<BR> help, but didn't want to be noticed in case of failure? Suddenly things made perfect sense. If this Forsaken was successful, he or she could claim credit for Rand's death and only Rhavin could
<BR> say otherwise. If he or she failed, then no one would know he or she was there at all.
<BR>
<BR> The list of suspects are short and I will limit it to those that we have previously seen T'A'R. Up to that point we had only seen Moggy, Lanfear, Rahvin, Sammael, and Graendal in T'A'R. We
<BR> know that all of them could be there, but some were more powerful than others. Moggy and Rhavin are out because we know where they were at the time of Asmo's death. Lanfear may or
<BR> may not be dead, but the style of attack doesn't fit her. And she was very accomplished in T'A'R. She would have been able to kill him. But the fish and the water were dispersed by Rand, so
<BR> the Fosaken could not have been too strong in T'A'R. That leaves Sammael and Graendal.
<BR>
<BR> We also know from LoC [chap 6, Threads of Woven Shadow,133-134] that Graendal tries to convince Sammael that Rand killed Asmo and Lanfear. We also know that, as per Moggy,
<BR> Graendal was supposed to be with Rahvin in setting the trap for Rand at Sammael's place.
<BR>
<BR> In brief, my theory goes like this: Rahvin and Graendal were together when Rand tripped Rahvin's wards in Caemlyn. They Travel together to Caemlyn. Rahvin is felt, and Rand storms after
<BR> him into T'A'R. Graendal tries to slip in some extra help but doesn't want to be noticed. (Afraid for her life.) Rand balefires Rhavin and Graendal decides to stay real low for a while, not
<BR> wanting to be noticed by anyone, including the Aes Sedai. Asmo, looking for wine, accidently finds her hiding spot and Graendal kills him to keep him from telling Rand.
<BR>
<BR> This satisfies all 8 requirements of the killer.
<BR> 1. Means: The One Power. Killed quickly and quietly.
<BR> 2. Motive: To prevent Rand from discovering she was there and chasing her.
<BR> 3. Opportunity: She was there as part of Rahvin's plots, helping him. Moggy said she would be with him.
<BR> 4. Be recognized: Asmo would have known her and been afraid of her.
<BR> 5. Dispose of the body: The One Power could easily do it.
<BR> 6. Must know Asmo's fate: She tried to convince Sammael of it.
<BR> 7. Reason it is kept secret: She is careful. She doesn't want Rand to learn she was there. She is afraid of him and doesnt want to be a target.
<BR> 8. Be "obvious." : Once you realize that someone was in T'A'R helping Rahvin, it becomes obvious who it must have been.
<BR>
<BR> I know this is a long winded post, but I wanted to cover everything. Any replies or holes in this theory are welcome.
Knarfling
7th August 2001, 18:46
I am curious as to why you posted this. if you did it to disagree with me, why did you use me to quote me? And if you agree with me, why quote an earlier theory of mine?
<BR>
<BR>I recognize that theory post because I wrote it. (Not the similarity between Knarfling and myself.) It came from Wotmania and the reason it says May 27, 2001 is because that is when Wotmania actually updated their theory board. The post was actually done about three years ago, shortly before PoD came out. It was posted first on wotism.org and then posted again on wotmania after PoD. Back then, there was still some question about the way balefire worked in TAR, and my theory incorrectly states that Graendal created the fish that bit Rand. I still remember a huge debate with Contact on the wotism.org board about this theory. Since then, RJ has stated that Rahvin did create the fish.
<BR>
<BR>Let me state that while the first theory had an incorrect reason for Graendal to be there, the theory is still valid. I have refined the theory that I posted here. I also found the extra supporting evidence, such as why Greandal thought Moggy was dead, after I posted the original theory.
<BR>
<BR>Now, after all that, I will not claim that I was the originator of the theory. Many people before me claimed that Graendal was the killer. I have yet to see any other theory that discusses the relationship between Graendal and Moggy, but that does not mean that someone did not discover it before me.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>Knarfling
Jacob
9th August 2001, 16:03
Well I'm abit curius too now! But either way, very impressive theory worked out:)
Richelieu
12th August 2001, 17:36
I meant no offense - I respected and agreed with your original theory and for all the new people I figured it was a bit of historical reference to encourage more creative thinking on topics thought to be resolved long time ago.
Buckweet
30th August 2001, 11:47
It has been Agreed upon for good while now and I believe there was a vote on wotmania's site. By a huge landslide
Bela was named killer of Asmodean. Come on...we all know she did it....admit that you voted for the mare like i did!!;)
:D
Buckweet Gaidin
Jacob
28th September 2001, 09:51
I thought it was agreed upon some time ago that it was Patric Nielsen Heiden that killed Asmodean (he should have one of Stonedog's T-shirts) so I'll admit to no such thing!
:cool:
balefire
2nd November 2001, 01:23
Originally posted by Knarfling
Back then, there was still some question about the way balefire worked in TAR, and my theory incorrectly states that Graendal created the fish that bit Rand. I still remember a huge debate with Contact on the wotism.org board about this theory. Since then, RJ has stated that Rahvin did create the fish.
Sorry to be dredging up a tired old question, but I still haven't got a final answer as to who killed Asmodean. I suppose balefire works differently in Tel'aran'rhiod as compared to the waking world? Is that the reason Rand's wounds didn't heal after Rahvin got balefired?
GWINNA
3rd November 2001, 02:06
Originally posted by balefire
Sorry to be dredging up a tired old question, but I still haven't got a final answer as to who killed Asmodean. I suppose balefire works differently in Tel'aran'rhiod as compared to the waking world? Is that the reason Rand's wounds didn't heal after Rahvin got balefired?
The wounds stayed their because Rand thought they should! Afte He balefired Rahvin the initial wounds were healed, however Rand didn't have a good enough understanding of balefire at the time(Remember, he is surprised Mat and Aviendha were alive again)that he thought he should be injured, so he was. When Nyneave "healed" him he thought he should be better, so he was. It is either that or because time flows diffrently in the Dream World, the effects of balefire didn't reach back that far as the fish thing happened before the point to which Rahvin was burned to, as we have seen that The world of Dreams has seperate time line that doesn't match the rest of the world, if you want a better explaination, ask a physics major.
balefire
3rd November 2001, 02:32
Originally posted by G.W.I.N.N.A
if you want a better explaination, ask a physics major.
I'm sure RJ wouldn't write a book that requires a physics degree to understand.:rolleyes:
GWINNA
3rd November 2001, 23:03
Originally posted by balefire
I'm sure RJ wouldn't write a book that requires a physics degree to understand.:rolleyes:
True
Piney K
24th January 2002, 21:51
As to the fishes biting Rand , we know that Rand removed them through force of will , he caused them to stop existing in Tel'aran'rhiod . Had he understood TAR as well as say Egwene (she removes the welts from the waking world to make Bela more comfortable [ she does this in the flesh ]) he may have been able to heal himself but the wounds would have returned full force when he returned to the real world .
What we know of TAR is that it tries to hold a true reflection of the waking world . Balefire operates in direct competition to this , suddenly what was true in the world is no longer true . Rahvin died before the moment the balefire touched him . TAR could not catch up with the change that quickly that is why the wounds are still there . Also with Rand constant belief they are there this would hold them there even after the cause died .
On another point entirely does anyone remember if Lews Therin seemed any stronger in TAR , I have a vague recollection of Rand having such a thought but cannot find it in the books .
Running Wolf
25th January 2002, 00:30
Rand would be clumsier in TAR , with changing things. But doesnt it stand to reason that once he sets his mind or will to something in TAR he may actually be exceptionally strong??
wingo
26th April 2002, 20:12
I like the idea that lanfear used one of her wishes to kill asmodean and that the price for his life was her life as well.
Emerald Eyes
30th April 2002, 22:20
um... well... I'm only at the end of book 6, and I was kind of hoping the Asmodean mystery would be solved by the time I get to book 9. :::sigh::: I guess it's not. Oh well. I just hope he comes back. He added a good "good guy or bad guy?" kind of an air to the story. I liked him. But I have a feeling that he WILL come back. Remember when Mat and Asmodean got struck by lightning and died? Well, why did he bring Asmodean back to life if he was just going to disappear at the end of the book anyhow?
Knarfling
12th May 2002, 04:34
I haven't been around in a while, so I am a bit behind in the messages. However, here is what I know.
First of all, Rj has stated (at a signing in Australia) that Balefire does work differently in TAR. The wounds would have healed on their own after a time, but because of the way TAR works, it takes longer to changes things back to the way they were. The way that I understood it, when balefire burns something, it is like the end of the thread is still burning a little after the fire is removed. Sort of like it is smoldering. In TAR, that smoldering effect is slowed down by the changable nature of TAR. The wounds did not stay because Rand thought that they would be there, they stayed because the thread hadn't burned back that far yet. In a few minutes, the wounds would had disappeard on their own.
As for Asmodean, RJ has specifically stated that he is "Road Kill". While he may be reborn in another Age, he will not be brought back by the DO.
Knarfing
Vivacia
12th May 2002, 13:32
~hugs~ It's good to have you back Knarfling. I hope to see you around a lot more often.
dannyant
1st February 2005, 14:06
I am not that attached to the lanfear killed Asmodean theory.
But One thing I noticed was that Grendel noted that she would have thought Cyndane was Lanfear, except for the fact that she was slightly weaker in the one power.
So if someone is brought back they SHOULD have the same strength right?
I thought that this happend as part of her bargan with the Finn. She got 3 wishes and gave up a small amount of her power.
Enariom
1st February 2005, 16:07
Hi dannyant. If you look at the date of the last post, you'll see that this thread has been dead for almost three years.
Just thought I'd let you know :)
Aragorn
2nd February 2005, 01:40
Geez, I haven't talked to Knarf in years.
vBulletin v3.5.1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.