PDA

View Full Version : Sul'dam poll


Priest
12th December 2001, 10:25
The sul'dam reak evilness in the way that they have the ability to channel yet they ensalve the ones that have the spark. Yet there is something really cool about them.

Who would not like to be able to be a sul'dam just for a day and have a very attractive damane be your slave for a day. Very wrong but i just can not stop thinking how enjoyable that could be.

Larkin
12th December 2001, 11:06
Wait a second, that adam thing lets them feel everything you feel but multiplied, and they'll do whatever you say, ohhhhhh.....

That's cool.

Strabo
12th December 2001, 12:55
the only problem I can really see with it is that to become a sul'dam you have to be female...and then having an attractive damane doesn't count for as much ;) Of course there is still the joy of wrecking havoc everywhere you go...

Meyley
12th December 2001, 13:32
Of course, for some women that wouldn't be an issue.....

Priest
12th December 2001, 23:09
Awww....let a man have his fantasy

balefire
13th December 2001, 05:32
Originally posted by Priest
The sul'dam reak evilness in the way that they have the ability to channel yet they ensalve the ones that have the spark. Yet there is something really cool about them.

Who would not like to be able to be a sul'dam just for a day and have a very attractive damane be your slave for a day. Very wrong but i just can not stop thinking how enjoyable that could be.

The sul'dam-damane system sucks to the Pit of Doom!! Is it right to turn someone into damane just because the poor girl is born knowing how to touch saidar? A sul'dam isn't all that different, & yet their fates are so drastically different. Light, can you imagine wanting to kill yourself but you can't? That's a fate worse than death. The system should be scrapped & all sul'dam balefired.

Shadow Angel
3rd February 2003, 19:38
This thread is dirty... having sex with slaves is rape. *balefires thread* *wonders why he revived it*

Nobbin
3rd February 2003, 19:41
LoL, can we balefire you too Shadow ANgel for bumping it back up? This may now be the only thread that has gone off topic from *more explicit sexual acts* to *normalcy*

baxts
3rd February 2003, 19:50
just a note on larkins comment aboutt hings being multiplied, we know that they *ahem* "enjoy" themselves a lot more when there is a bond with men that can channel, (source being the comments of the aes sedai that logain captured and is bedding), but if the same applied to ordinary men, we'd have heard something before from one of the other aes sedai i would of thought

epiph
3rd February 2003, 20:04
what if you had sex with someone you were linked to?

baxts
3rd February 2003, 20:07
i dunno, if they could both channel, i guess it wiouldhave the same effetc /a shrugs coz hes not really sure.

Nobbin
3rd February 2003, 20:35
I think we had a little things on Condoms made of the OP back on "Does Rand use a condom" You could use a little extra air and some fire for a feisty time, or do some natural enhancement with air, earth, and fire... I figure a condom made of air and fire would be pretty efficient, but be careful! You don;t want to miss with that little bit of fire! /shudder... Myrelle and Lan were humping for a while...

**EDIT** What happens if you have a manage de quat with Rand and his bitches???

Karistina
3rd February 2003, 21:52
Bond/Air/Fire... Tomas and I wrote a bit in our story a few weeks ago...

http://www.wildeggplant.com/wheel-of-time/wot045.htm

::Psst - Nobbin, the term is a French term, Menage a trois::

Nobbin
3rd February 2003, 22:47
Bah whatever, dumb frenchies ;) Sexo con tres cabras ;) That's my friend (NOT ME!)

baxts
4th February 2003, 02:39
menage a quatre sounds fun

Sparrow
4th February 2003, 12:54
I guess if you bind a woman the Logain way it would be fun

Shadow Angel
4th February 2003, 14:41
lol... *thinks we have an orgey thread in Theories*

Sparrow
4th February 2003, 15:30
If you bond several chicks you can have a live lesbian show whenever you want for free!

Shadow Angel
5th February 2003, 16:23
lol

What if you twist the bond to make them have pain and you not any at all. Like the a'dam. You know there getting pain... but you don't feel it.

Lady Socleia
11th February 2003, 00:23
If sul'dam have the ability to channel, why arent they damane? is it that they are to weak in the power to be a damane or....?

Carrig Gaidin
11th February 2003, 00:44
The seanchan don't know that the sul'dam have the ability to channel. When they test women, the ones that have the spark born into them (those that would begin channeling whether or not they wanted to) become damane. The ones that have the ability to learn to channel, but never would without training, are made sul'dam.

It ought to be interesting when this becomes common knowledge among the Seanchan. :D

Lady Socleia
11th February 2003, 00:47
oh, that makes sense, but how do they see the weaves? is it really from being a sul'dam awhile like they think?

Carrig Gaidin
11th February 2003, 01:09
Well, yeah...but not for the reason they think. The sul'dam is indirectly channeling when she is connected to a damane. Just like a novice in the tower, they'll eventually begin to be able to see the flows.


Been a little while since you've read the series, Socleia? ;) I'm fairly certain the books explain this in detail...

Alys
11th February 2003, 07:33
Just a note for some of the earlier comments...

For the Seanchan, having any kind of a sexual act with a damane is considered a form of bestiality. If a sul'dam or anyone else did that it would be like doing it with a dog. It makes sense, in a way. They train them to give up any and all of their humanity, until they become like animals.

I'm not quite sure how I feel about that. At least it would protect the helpless damane from being molested, but then again it just enforces Seanchan feeling that they are nothing more then animals to train.

It's an icky, nasty situation. The a'dams should be piled up and balefired away.

;)